Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18945 (KAR)

K R CHIDAMBARA v. STATE BY WOMAN POLICE

CRL.RP/1895/2025 · 2026-06-03

H P Sandesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26116 CRL.RP No. 1895 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1895 OF 2025 BETWEEN: K R CHIDAMBARA S/O RADHAKRISHNA AGED 40 YEARS 2814, 2ND MAIN MYSURU – 570014 …PETITIONER (BY SRI RADHAKRISHNA, ADVOCATE) AND: STATE BY WOMAN POLICE DEVARAJA P.S. MYSORE …RESPONDENT (BY SRI DIVAKAR MADDUR, HCGP) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 438 R/W 448 BNSS, 2033 PRAYING THIS COURT TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 24.11.2025 PASSED IN CRL.MISC.NO.1072/2025 BY THE PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26116 CRL.RP No. 1895 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER This matter is called twice that is in the morning session and also in the afternoon session and no representation by the counsel for the petitioner. 2. Office has raised the objection that revision is not maintainable against the prayer sought under the provision of Section 397 read with Section 401 of Cr.P.C. or Section 438 read with 448 of BNSS in view of the specific provision under Section 407 of Cr.P.C. When such objection is raised and when the petition itself is not maintainable, the same is dismissed. 3. Registry is directed to return the certified copies of the documents to the petitioner counsel if counsel approaches the registry. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SN