Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18944 (CHH)

SHIV KUMAR SAHU v. Mahtarin Bai,

WPC/4251/2022 · 2026-05-11

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:22294 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4251 of 2022 1 - Shiv Kumar Sahu S/o Late Ledga Sahu Aged About 44 Years Residents Of Gram- Kathiya, Tehsil - Berla, District - Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Dilip Kumar Sahu S/o Late Ledga Sahu Aged About 53 Years Residents Of Gram- Kathiya, Tehsil - Berla, District - Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Ramkumar Sahu S/o Late Ledga Sahu Aged About 60 Years Residents Of Gram- Kathiya, Tehsil - Berla, District - Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Mahtarin Bai, W/o Late Ramanand Sahu R/o Kathiya, Tahisl Berka, District - Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Pushpalata D/o Late Ramanand R/o Gram Andhiyarkhor, Tahsil Navagarh, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh. 3 - Savita, D/o Late Ramanand Sahu R/o Gram - Neur (Ruse) Tahsil - Navagarh, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. 5 - The Commissioner, Durg Division, Office Of Commissioner, District - Durg Chhattisgarh. 6 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Berla, District - Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. 7 - The Tahsildar, Tehsil - Berla District - Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. 2 ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :- None For State :- Mr. Soumitra Kesharwani, P.L. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 12.05.2026 1. Heard. 2. Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner even when the matter is called out in the second round, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss this petition for want of prosecution, as it appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the case. 3. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha