HARPAL SINGH ALIAS HARIYAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
BA3/13/2026 · 2026-04-02
Rakesh Thapliyal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1894 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1894 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
BA3 No. 13 of 2026
Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Mr. Lalit Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned A.G.A. with Mrs. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. The correction application has been moved for seeking correction in the order dated 02.04.2026, whereby, the applicant was enlarged on bail.
4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that in paragraph-3 of the order Section 302 of IPC be incorporated in the 6th line of paragraph-3.
5. Learned State counsel have no objection.
6. Accordingly, the correction application is allowed.
7. The order dated 02.04.2026 be corrected by inserting Section 302 of IPC in the 6th line of paragraph-
3.
8. This order be treated as part of the order dated
02.04.2026.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 08.04.2026 PR