[2026:RJ-JP:2617] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12667/2025 1. Mahaveer Prasad Meena S/o Shisupal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Barani, P/s Sadar Baran, District Baran, (Raj.) (Accused Is Presently Confined At District Jail Baran) 2. Shisupal Meena S/o Birdhilal Meena, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Barani, P/s Sadar Baran, District Baran, (Raj.) (Accused Is Presently Confined At District Jail Baran) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhim Singh Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rahore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 21/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.305/2024 registered at Police Station Sadar Baran, District Baran for the offence(s) under Sections 103(1) and 61(2)(a) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the material eye witnesses PW-4 Soobhagmal, PW-7 Deen Dayal and PW-8 Ram Gopal have turned hostile and not supported the prosecution story. The similarly placed co-accused Naval Kishore has already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated [2026:RJ-JP:2617] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-12667/2025] 16.10.2025. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 12.11.2024 and further trial of the case may take considerable time and charge-sheet has already been submitted, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the petitioner along with the other co-accused assaulted the deceased and the said incident was captured in a mobile video prepared by PW-4 Soobhagmal and PW-4 Soobhagmal handed over the mobile to the police and the same was recovered, in the video, the petitioner was seen beating the deceased. The statement of the Investigating Officer who recovered the mobile is to be recorded, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioners may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case. The co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 16.10.2025 has enlarged the co-accused Naval Kishore on bail and the allegation against the present petitioner is akin to the other co-accused, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Mahaveer Prasad Meena S/o Shisupal and 2. Shisupal Meena S/o Birdhilal Meena, in connection with FIR No.305/2024 registered at Police Station Sadar Baran, District Baran, shall be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of [2026:RJ-JP:2617] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-12667/2025] Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The learned trial Judge shall also verify the address and the contact details of the surety through concerned SHO before releasing the accused- petitioner on bail. 7. The accused-petitioners are also directed to mark their presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioners and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioners on the same day to the concerned Trial Court without any delay. In case of any breach to the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The accused-petitioners are also directed to submit his present address along with the mobile number to the concerned SHO within a period of 7 days from his release and the concerned SHO shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the petitioners changes their address or mobile number, he shall submit the same before the concerned SHO so also before the concerned learned Trial Court. 9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned SHO for its strict compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/44