Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18935 (JHR)

RAHUL KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6148/2026 · 2026-07-03

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:19615 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6148 of 2026 ------ Rahul Kumar, aged about 24 years, son of Late Gopal Prasad Keshri, resident of Near Sarkari School, Bandah, P.O. & P.S.-Rikhiya, District-Deoghar. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-03-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Mohanpur P.S. Case No.58 of 2026, registered for the offences punishable under Section 310(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 25(1- B)(a)/26/27/35 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has looted cash of Rs.2000/- and Galaxy Mobile of the driver of Tata Magic vehicle, who was transporting refrigerators in his vehicle. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is further submitted that the Test Identification Parade has not been conducted in respect of the petitioner, as has been mentioned in para-10 of the bail petition. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 25.04.2026 as is mentioned in para-16 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as is mentioned in para-15 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar, in connection with Mohanpur P.S. Case No.58 of 2026, with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 03/07/2026 Abhiraj/