Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:2962-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12530/2013
1. Kuldeep S/o Shri Vinay Kumar, aged 45 years, B/c OBC, R/o Village Kanwarpura, Post Bhakhtawarpuri, Tehsil Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
2. Balbir Singh S/o Late Hari Singh, aged 46 years, by-caste Jat (OBC), Resident of Village & Post Hamirwas, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Churu (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State of Rajasthan, through Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Dy. Secretary, Department of Personnel (A-2), Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The Director, Army Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Basant Singh Chhaba, AAG with Mr. Hardik Singh, Mr. Vinayam Saran, Ms. Mahi Choudhary, Mr. Rahul Gupta and Ms. Yuvika Pilania, Asst. G.C.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 22/01/2026 No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner even in the second round. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers:-
“(i) By an appropriate writ, order and direction in the nature thereof thereby the impugned gazette notification dated 10.6.2008 whereby the Rajasthan various (Misc.) Services amendment Rule 2008
[2026:RJ-JP:2962-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-12530/2013] amended and circular dated 27.6.2008 to this extent that the benefit compassionate allowed of appointment will be to the wards of soldier or one of the dependent of a member of Armed Force who died was permanently incapacitated in any war, operation or battle causality during period 1.1.1971 to 31.3.1999 are liable to be struck down or scrutinized. to be modified or to be scrutinized. ii) The respondents may further be directed to allow appointment to the petitioners the post on of PTI/ LDC under compassionate ground by making amendment/modification/ scrutinizing in the impugned notification dated 10.6.2008 whereby Rules 2008 was amended and impugned circular dated 27.6.2008 by treating them within age limit or other eligibility criteria after being withdrawn rejection orders dated 24.10.2008 & 28.7.2008- respectively iii) Any other order which this Hon'ble Court deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioners.” We have gone through the prayers made in this writ petition. In our considered view, by a flux of time, this writ petition has become infructuous, and the same is disposed of as having become infructuous.
(RAVI CHIRANIA),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Dushyant/60