THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THE COLLECTOR SLAO CIDCO PROJECT, NASHIK AND ANR. v. BABURAO BHAVDU GAIKWAD
IA/7366/2024 · 2026-10-13
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18926 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18926 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
74-FAst-20656-21+.doc
Sayali IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 20656 OF 2021 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.7366 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7367 OF 2024
The State Of Maharashtra The Collector (Land Acquisition) CIDCO Project, Nashik and others … Appellants V/s. Baburao Bhavdu Gaikwad … Respondents Mr. A. R. Patil, Additional GP for State-Appellant. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : OCTOBER 13, 2026 P.C.:
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.7366 OF 2024
1. Considering the reasons assigned in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the interim application, the same is allowed. The delay caused in filing the first appeal stands condoned.
2. The interim application stands disposed of. 1 SAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI Digitally signed by SAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI Date: 2026.10.13 17:55:25 +0530
74-FAst-20656-21+.doc FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 20656 OF 2021
3. The present First Appeal arises from the judgment and Award dated 21 February 2018 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division,Nashik. On consideration of the enhanced compensation awarded by the Reference Court, it is noticed that the amount of enhancement is less than Rs.2 lakh. Having regard to the quantum involved and the applicable administrative policy governing appeals in matters involving such limited enhancement, I am of the view that no interference with the impugned judgment and Award is warranted in the present appeal.
4. In view of the aforesaid circumstance, the First Appeal is dismissed.
5. It is clarified that this Court has not examined or adjudicated upon the merits of the claims or the correctness of the findings recorded by the Reference Court. The dismissal of the First Appeal is confined to the ground that the amount of enhanced compensation involved is less than Rs.2 lakh. The dismissal shall, therefore, not be construed as an adjudication on the merits of the judgment and Award under challenge.
6. In view of the disposal of the First Appeal, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive and are accordingly disposed of.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.) 2