[2026:RJ-JP:3363] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 972/2024 Mirza Mujahid S/o Shri Nisar Ahmed Mirza, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Near Tagore School, Anantpur, Kota (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Ashish Modi, Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner. 2. Shri Krishan Kumar Sharma, District Education Officer, Head Office Secondary, Kota. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.M. Sharma on behalf of Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG Mr. Rajesh Goyal, OIC, ADEO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 24/01/2026 1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. 2. This contempt petition was registered on reference made by the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal (for short, 'Tribunal') vide order dated 05.09.2024, whereby after preliminary enquiry, it was found by the Tribunal that order dated 26.04.2024 passed by the Tribunal in Appeal No. 1685/2024 was not complied with by the respondents. 3. Vide such order dated 26.04.2024, the appeal filed by the petitioner was allowed and directions were given to the respondents to issue posting order of the petitioner in Headquarter, District-Kota at any place. [2026:RJ-JP:3363] (2 of 2) [CCP-972/2024] 4. Sh. Rajesh Goyal, Additional District Education Officer, present in person, submitted that reply to the contempt petition has been filed by the respondents revealing therein that in strict compliance of order passed by Tribunal, the petitioner has already been posted vide order dated 18.07.2025 in the Office of Chief Block Education Officer, Panchayat Samiti-Itawa, District-Kota. He submits that in view of such order, since compliance has been made, therefore, this contempt petition may be closed. 5. In the light of statement given by Sh. Rajesh Goyal on the basis of reply to the contempt petition, no case of deliberate and wilfull disobedience is found. Hence, the present contempt petition is dismissed. 6. Notices stand discharged. 7. However, in case, the statement made by the respondents is not correct, the petitioner is at liberty to revive the instant contempt petition. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/8