SANGITA LAKSHMAN BODKE v. BANSILAL SHANKAR SANGLE AND ORS
WP/13305/2026 · 2026-10-13
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18921 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18921 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
905-WP-13305-2026.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 13305 OF 2026
Sangita Lakshman Bodke ..Petitioner Versus Bansilal Shankar Sangle and Ors …Respondents Mr. Girish R Agrawal, with Chitra Darekar, for the Petitioner. Mr. Prashant D Patil, for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM:
N. J. JAMADAR, J.
DATE :
13th OCTOBER 2026 P.C.:
1. Heard the leaned Counsel for the parties.
2. The challenge in this Petition is to an order dated 16th September 2026 passed by the Appellate Tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents And Senior Citizens Act, 2007.
3. Mr. Patil, the learned Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 informs the Court that the said Appeal No. 20 of 2026 in which the impugned order has been passed has itself been finally heard and posted for pronouncement of judgment tomorrow, 14th October 2026.
4. Mr. Prashant D Patil, the learned Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2-the senior citizens, on instructions, submits that till the decision ARS 1/2 ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL Digitally signed by ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL Date: 2026.10.14 15:01:23 +0530
905-WP-13305-2026.DOC of the Appeal, Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 will not create any third party interest in the subject premises.
5. Recording the aforesaid statement, the Petition stands disposed.
6. It is hereby made clear that this Court has not entered into the merits of the matter and the Appellate Tribunal is requested to hear and decide the Appeal on its own merits and in accordance with law.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] ARS 2/2