Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:19073 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.) No. 299 of 2026 Samina Khatoon ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Director General of Police, Jharkhand 3. The Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand 4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Dhurwa, Ranchi 5. The Superintendent of Police, Ramgarh 6. The Office-in-Charge of Mandu P.S., Ramgarh 7. Yasin Mian 8. Kasim Mian 9. Hasina Bibi 10. Rebun Khatoon 11. Shahnaj Khatoon 12. Afzal Ansari 13. Sajda Khatoon 14. Salma Khatoon … Respondents --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : None For the State : Mr. Shubham Gautam, AC to Sr. AAG --- Order No. 02 Dated 30th June, 2026 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned AC to Sr. AAG is present. The petitioner in this writ application has prayed for a direction upon the concerned respondents to thoroughly investigate Mandu P.S. Case No. 16 of 2023. The petitioner has also prayed for a direction upon the respondents for DNA profiling of the deceased. In the context of the grievance of the petitioner, reference may be made to the case of “Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P. and Ors.”, reported in (2008) 2 SCC 409, wherein it has been held as follows: “26. If a person has a grievance that his FIR has not been registered by the police station his first remedy is to approach the Superintendent of Police under Section 154(3) CrPC or other police officer referred to in Section 36 CrPC. If despite approaching the Superintendent of Police or the officer referred to in Section 36 his grievance still persists, then he can approach a Magistrate under Section 156(3) CrPC instead of rushing to the High Court by way of a writ petition or a petition under Section 482 CrPC. Moreover, he has a further remedy of filing a criminal complaint under Section 200 CrPC. Why then should writ petitions or Section 482 petitions be entertained when there are so many alternative remedies? 27. As we have already observed above, the Magistrate has very wide powers to direct registration of an FIR and to ensure a proper investigation and for this purpose he can monitor the investigation to ensure that the investigation is done properly (though he cannot investigate himself). The High Court should discourage the practice of filing a writ petition or petition under Section 482 CrPC simply because a person has a grievance that his FIR has not been registered by the police, or after being registered, proper investigation has not been done by the police. For this grievance, the remedy lies under Sections 36 and 154(3) before the police officers concerned, and if that is of no avail, under Section 156(3) CrPC before the Magistrate or by filing a criminal complaint under Section 200 CrPC and not by filing a writ petition or a petition under Section 482 CrPC.” In view of the alternative remedy available to the petitioner, I am not inclined to entertain this writ application which accordingly stands disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to avail of the alternative remedy. (RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY,J.) 30.06.2026 MK Page-2