Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18918 (JHR)

PUSHPA GIRI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/747/2024 · 2026-07-03

Sujit Narayan Prasad

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:19501] Page | 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Cvl.) No. 747 of 2024 --------- 1. Pushpa Giri @ Puspa Giri, aged about 57 years, w/o Late Shankar Prasad Giri, her late husband was posted as Head Master Incharge, Marwari, Hindi Middle School, Mahulia, Ghatsila, Singhbhum (East), resident of P.S.-Ghatsila, P.O.-Mahulia, District-Singhbhum East. 2. Amita Mahto alias Mahato aged about 60 years, w/o Late Bimal Kumar Mahto, her late husband was posted as Head Master Incharge Baliguri Middle School, at & P.S.-Baliguri, P.S.-Chakulia, District-Singhbhum East. … … Petitioners Versus 1. State of Jharkhand. 2. Rahul Kumar Purwar, IAS, father’s name not known to the petitioners, Secretary, Department of Human Resource and Development, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, PO & PS Dhurwa, Ranchi. 3. Sri Ananya Mittal, father’s name not known to the petitioners at present posted as Deputy Commissioner cum Chairman, District Establishment Committee, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur at and PO & PS Jamshedpur, District Singhbhum East, Jharkhand. 4. Mr. Ashish Kumar Pandey, father’s name not known to the petitioners, at present posted as District Superintendent of Education cum Member Secretary, District Establishment Committee, Jamshedpur, Singhbhum East, Near JSR Blood Bank, at & PO & PS Bistupur, Jamshedpur Town, District Singhbhum East. … …Opp. Parties --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD ---------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Ganesh Ram, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Apoorva Singh, AC to SC (Mines)-II ---------- 05/Dated: 03rd July, 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the order, subject matter of the instant contempt petition, has been complied with, as such, he does not intend to press the instant contempt petition. 2. Accordingly, the instant contempt petition stands closed, as such, disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) 03rd July, 2026 Saurabh/-