Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18917 (HP)

SONAL SHARMA v. ROSHAN LAL AND OTHERS

CMP.M/644/2026 · 2026-08-05

Sushil Kukreja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sonal Sharma Pant Vs. Roshan Lal & Ors. CMP(M) No. 644/2026 05.08.2026 Present: Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, vice Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 1. Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 3. Respondents No. 2 & 4 are ex parte. CMP(M) No. 644/2026 No reply to the application is intended to be filed. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant, this Court finds sufficient cause to condone the delay that has occurred in filing the present appeal. Consequently, the application is allowed and delay that has occurred in filing the present appeal, is condoned. The application stands disposed of. FAO (MV) No. /2026 Appeal be registered. Heard. Admit. Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, vice Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, accept service of post admission notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 & 3, respectively. Let post admission notice be issued to respondents No. 2 & 4 returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within three days. List thereafter. In the meantime, let records of learned Tribunal below be also called for. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 5th August, 2026 (raman)