Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25436 WP No. 36041 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 36041 OF 2024 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN:
SRI. SANJEEV SAXENA, S/O SURESH SAXENA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO. 96, 3RD MAIN, KEMPANNA LAYOUT, HEBBAL POST, BENGALURU - 560032. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. THANUJA M V.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560001.
2.
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, NO.1, INFANTRY ROAD, OPP. SPARSHA HOSPITAL, BENGALURU - 560001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. DEVARAJ C.H., GA FOR R1 & R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SEC. 528 OF BNSS PRAYING TO ISSUE AN ORDER OF DIRECTION OR WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT DTD 4.03.2024 VIDE ANNX-D PASSED BY THE R-2 AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25436 WP No. 36041 of 2024
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
ORAL ORDER
1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs; a. Issue an order of direction or writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned endorsement dated 04.03.2024 vide Annexure- D passed by the respondent No.2;
b. Issue an order of direction or writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No 2 to renew firearms license No. 42/RR/2010 in the name of the petitioner and;
c. Issue any writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court deems fit on the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.
2. What has essentially been challenged is the cancellation of the Arms licence issued to the petitioner and the subsequent endorsement which has been issued refusing to renew the Arms licence.
3. The petitioner has an alternative efficacy remedy to challenge the same before the Appellate Authority in terms of Rule 105 of the Arms Rules 2016.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25436 WP No. 36041 of 2024
4. Reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority by granting benefit under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, the petition stands
disposed.
Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
SR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 49