Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18915 (JHR)

FATTAHUR RAHMAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/4564/2026 · 2026-07-03

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:19497 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C ) No. 4564 of 2026 1. Fattahur Rahman, S/o Late Abdul Gaffar Khan, R/o New Azad Basti, P.O., P.S. & Dist.-Lohardaga 2. Tazdar Khan, S/o Late Abdul Gaffar Khan, R/o New Azad Basti, P.O., P.S. & Dist.-Lohardaga 3. Imam Noorani Khan, S/o Late Abdul Gaffar Khan, R/o Village-Chandu, P.O.- Jima, P.S.-Kuru, Dist.-Lohardaga 4. Zamiullah Khan, S/o Late Abdul Sajjad Khan, R/o New Azad Basti, P.O., P.S. & Dist.-Lohardaga 5. Javed Ahmad, S/o Late Abdul Gaffar Khan, R/o New Azad Basti, P.O., P.S. & Dist.-Lohardaga 6. Samsher Khan, S/o Maqsood Khan, R/o Badi Maszid Chowk, P.O. & P.S.-Kuru, Dist.-Lohardaga .... Petitioner(s). Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. D.C. Lohardaga 3. Nazrul Khan, S/o Late Mauzin Khan, R/o Village-Chandu, P.O. & P.S.-Kuru, Dist.-Lohardaga . … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Mokhtar Khan, Advocate For the State: Mr. Ankit Kumar, AC to SC-1 ------ 02/ 03.07.2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for quashing of order dated 05.07.2024 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Lohardaga in Mutation Revision Case No. 17 of 2020-21 and further for quashing of the entry made in Register-II (online) pursuant to the said order in the name of Nazrul Khan (Annexure-8). It has been further prayed to restore the order dated 21.01.2021 passed in Mutation Appeal No. 13 of 2019-20. 3. After going through the record, I find that there is dispute between the parties as the land is in joint possession. There cannot be individual Jamabandi when the land is joint. 4. If the petitioners want, they should file a suit for partition or for any other relief before the Civil Court, having competent jurisdiction which will be considered and after the decree is passed, it is expected that the Revenue Authorities will correct the record according to the decree passed in the suit. 5. The order passed by the Revenue Authorities will no way prejudice the Trial Court. 6. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 03rd July, 2026 Anu/SKC-CP-02 Uploaded on 06.07.2026