[2026:RJ-JP:5099] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7245/2025 Navneet Kumar Singhal S/o Sh. Shanti Swaroop Singhal, Aged About 55 Years, R/o F-2, D311, Ramprastha Colony, Distt. Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh- 201011. ----Accused Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. M/s Bajrang Trademart, Through Authorized Representative Shri Satyanarayan Dangaich Address Ground Floor, F-94, Road No. 6, V.K.I. Jaipur, At Present Address- Plot No. A-187, G, Road No. 6, V.K.I. Jaipur. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6197/2025 1. Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals Limited, Having its registered office At 1st Floor, Tower-3, Equinox Business Park, LBS Marg, Kurla (West) Mumbai - 400070 (Now Having its Registered Office At 05 GBD Godrej Business District, Pirojshanagar, LBS Road, Vikhroli (West), Mumbai - 400079 (Maharashtra) and its Northern Regional Office at 3rd Floor, Express Building, 9-10, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, Near ITO Office, New Delhi - 110002 Through Its Authorized Representative Mr. Keshav Sharma 2. Rajat Chopra S/o Shri Jeevan Prakash Chopra, Aged About 50 Years, R/o 23/55-A, Tilak Nagar, S.O., West Delhi, Delhi - 110018 . ----Accused Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor 2. M/s Bajrang Trademart, Through Authorized Representative Shri Satyanarayan Dangaich Address- Ground Floor, F-94, Road No.6, V.K.I. Jaipur. At Present Address- Plot No. A-187, G, Road No.6, V.k.I. Jaipur. ----Respondents [2026:RJ-JP:5099] (2 of 4) [CRLMP-7245/2025] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashvin Garg, Advocate Mr. Akshay Sharma, Advocate For Respondent(s) For State : Mr. Uma Shankar Acharya, Advocate Mr. Uday Singh Acharya, Advocate Ms. Nidhi Suwalka, Advocate Mr. Amit Punia, Addl. GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 03/02/2026 1. Since both these criminal misc. petitions have been filed under Section 528 BNSS for quashing the FIR No. 0259/2025 registered at Police Station, Vishwakarma, District Jaipur (West) for offence under Sections 420, 406 and 120B IPC and the proceedings emanating therefrom, on the basis of the compromise arrived at between the parties, they are being decided by this common order. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners are facing the trial for the offence under Sections 420, 406 and 120B IPC since long. They further submit that the alleged offences are not heinous and they are compoundable. They also submit that the dispute between the parties is personal in nature and both the parties have entered into a compromise. The original compromise has been annexed with the petition. Learned counsel further submits that in light of the judgments passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303 and The State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan reported in 2019 (5) SCC 688, the impugned FIR as also the proceedings emanating therefrom be quashed on the basis of the compromise arrived at between the parties. [2026:RJ-JP:5099] (3 of 4) [CRLMP-7245/2025] 3. Learned counsel for the respondent also admits the factum of compromise and submits that the complainant does not want to prosecute the petitioners further in the matter. 4. Per contra, learned Addl. GA has opposed the prayer made by counsel for the petitioners. 5. The petitioner in S.B. Cr. Misc. Petition No. 7245/2025; the authorized representative of petitioner no.1 company and the authorized representative of the respondent no.2 are present in person today in the Court. Their signature have been obtained on the court’s order sheet and they have been duly identified by their respective advocates. 6. Heard learned counsel for the parties, considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on the record. 7. Considering the arguments put forward by learned counsel for the parties and looking to the fact that the dispute between the parties is personal in nature, alleged offences are compoundable, the complainant does not want to prosecute the petitioners further in the matter, a compromise has been arrived at between the parties, and also applying the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh (supra) and Laxmi Narayan (supra), this Court deems it just and proper to invoke the inherent powers of this Court contained under Section 528 BNSS. 8. Accordingly, these criminal misc. petitions are allowed. The impugned FIR No. 259/2025 registered at Police Station Vishwakarma, District Jaipur (West) and the criminal proceedings emanating therefrom pending against the petitioners before the [2026:RJ-JP:5099] (4 of 4) [CRLMP-7245/2025] Court below are hereby quashed and set-aside on the basis of compromise. 9. Stay applications as well as all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 10. Registry is directed to place a copy of this order in connected file. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J DK/207-208