[2026:RJ-JP:13014] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 450/2026 1. Sanjana Verma D/o Shri Ramesh Chand Bairwa, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Ameer Colony Anantpura Kota, At Present Plot No. B-10 Magna Vihar Sanganer Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Bhuvnesh Sarwan S/o Shri Bablu, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Plot No. B-10, Magna Vihar Sanganer Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. The Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur Raj. 3. Station House Officer (S.h.o.), Police Station Shivdaspura, Distt. Jaipur. Raj. 4. Station House Officer (S.h.o.), Police Station Anakpura, Distt. Kota Raj. 5. Ramesh Chand Bairwa S/o Son Of Shri Faliram, Resident Of Ameer Colony Anantpura Kota (Raj). 6. Manju Varma Wife Of Shri Rahul Meghwal, Resident Of Village Telabh, Anakpura, Kota (Raj). 7. Rahul Meghwal Son Of Prabhu Dayal, Resident Of Village Telabh, Anakpura, Kota (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 27/03/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.5 to 7 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. [2026:RJ-JP:13014] (2 of 2) [CRLW-450/2026] 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are major and they are mature enough to take decision of their life. It is submitted that both the petitioners are unmarried. It is submitted that the petitioners are living in a live- in-relationship and in this regard, an agreement dated 12.03.2026 has also been executed between them, which has been annexed with this petition. Learned counsel further submits that petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.3-Station House Officer, Police Station Shivdaspura, District Jaipur (Raj) and respondent No.3 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /467