29-WP-4405-2025.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4405 OF 2025 Sunil Atmaram Patil & Anr. …Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents Mr. Anand Pande a/w. Mr. Vedansh Tripathi, for the Petitioners. Mr. Swapnil V. Walve, APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 13th OCTOBER 2026 PC:- 1. At the outset, Mr. Walve, learned APP states that the impugned order in this Writ Petition is the order issuing process and there is an alternate remedy of Revision to challenge the said order. 2. In view of the above contention raised by Mr. Walve, learned APP, Mr. Pande, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners seeks withdrawal of the Writ Petition with liberty to challenge the impugned order by filing Revision before the learned Sessions Court. Page 1 Sonali 29-WP-4405-2025.DOC 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as sought. 4. It is clarified that all contentions of all the parties are expressly kept open. 5. It is further clarified that as the impugned order dated 14th October 2024 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Wada, below Exhibit-1 in RCC No.84 of 2024 is challenged by way of this Writ Petition on 7th August 2025, the Petitioners are entitled for benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 from 7th August 2025 till today. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of, subject to above. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Page 2 Sonali SONALI MILIND PATIL Digitally signed by SONALI MILIND PATIL Date: 2026.10.14 10:56:54 +0530