Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18904 (AP)

SYED ALISHER v. STATE OF AP

CRLP/2107/2021 · 2026-01-28

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010130542021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2107/2021 Between: 1.SYED ALISHER, S/O LATE MAHABOOB BASHA, AGED 59 YEARS, RJO H.NO. 4/134, NEAR RAILWAY GATE, MUDDANUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1.STATE OF AP, BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUDDANUR POLICE STATION, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P, AMARAVATHI. 2.REPALLI PULLAIAH, S/O LATE REPALLI LINGAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RA) D.NO. 5/100-6-A8, FOUR ROADS JUNCTION, MUDDANUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.SODUM ANVESHA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: No representation for the Petitioner. 2. The proceedings issued by the Mandal Executive Officer in M.C.No.26 of 2018, dated 24.10.2018, are valid only for a limited period, as contemplated under Section 128(6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. 3. In view of the above and considering that the validity period of the said proceedings has expired, no further orders are required to be passed in the present criminal petition. 4. Recording the above submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 29.01.2026 PRA 3 147 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.2107 of 2021 Date:29.01.2026 PRA