Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18901 (RAJ)

MARK MICHAEL FERNANDES S/O MICHAEL GRAPH FERNANDES B/C CHRISTIAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/6002/2019 · 2026-02-13

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:6915] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6002/2019 Mark Michael Fernandes S/o Michael Graph Fernandes B/c Christian, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 1/604, Near Sea Christnani Park, Seven Bunglows, Andheri West, Mumbai 400061, Mumbai Railway Maharashtra, Presently At Unit 17, Inn Lincoln St, Highgate, Perth, Western Australia, 6003, Australia. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp. 2. Mishael Sarika Innocent W/o Mark Michael Fernandes B/c Christian, Aged About 30 Years, R/o H.no.32, Doms Compound, Jaipur Road, Ajmer, Civil Line, Ajmer, Raj., Permanent Address 89, Ewart Street Midland Perth, Western Australia, Post Code 6056, Australia. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Agarwal. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT Order 13/02/2026 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of the impugned FIR and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom. 2. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that no interim protection of any kind operates in favour of the petitioner and by afflux of time the investigation might have been concluded. 3. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the instant petition at this stage, but seeks liberty for the petitioner to file a fresh petition, if occasion so arises. [2026:RJ-JP:6915] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6002/2019] 4. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J 15-Jitender/Sachin