Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18900 (CHH)

HAJI MIR KADIR ALI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2393/2023 · 2026-05-13

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:22997 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2393 of 2023 1 - Haji Mir Kadir Ali S/o Late Mir Zakir Ali Aged About 72 Years R/o Jal- Grih Marg, Near Chandni Chowk, Nehru Nagar, P.S. City Kotwail, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Ex Mutwalli - Hazrat Fatehshah Mazar And Masjid Trust, Police Line, Tikrapara, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe Development, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Chhattisgarh State Waqf Board Through Its Chief Executive Officer, In Front Of Dr. B R Ambedkar Statue, Collectorate Square, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Chief Executive Officer Chhattisgarh State Waqf Board, In Front Of Dr. B R Ambedkar Statue, Collectorate Square, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 4 - Ashraful Aulia Maszid Through Mutwalli, Maudahapara, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 5 - Sunni Masjid Trust Nayapara, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 6 - Shoaib Khan Retired Dy. Superintendent Of Police, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) C/o Chhattisgarh State Waqf Board, In Front Of Dr. B R Ambedkar Statue, Collectorate Square, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 7 - Farhan Quraishi Dy. Superintendent Of Police, Economic Offence Wing, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 8 - A N Akhtar Dy. Superintendent Of Police, Railway, Raipur (Chhattigarh) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri N Naha Roy, Advocate. For Respondent No.2 & 3 : Shri Prateek Singh Thakur, Advocate. For Respondent No.4 : Shri Shashank Thakur, Advocate. For State : Shri Anand Dadariya, Dy AG and Shri SS Choubey, GA. AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2026.05.18 18:42:28 +0530 2 (Hon'ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge) Order on Board 14/05/2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JUDGE Avinash