HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 6365 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Mohd. Saud Siddiqui, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for State-Respondents. 2. It is very strange that petitioner’s claim has already been rejected vide order dated 05.02.2026 and despite a copy of same is annexed alongwith this writ petition, still it has not been challenged. Therefore, it is an example of poor drafting. 3. However, still considering the prayer of learned counsel for petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to file a fresh with better particulars with cost of Rs. 500/- to be deposited in the Bank account of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad. 4. Registry will accept fresh petition only after receipt of payment of cost. May 7, 2026 AK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Saeed Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Kazim Hasan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad