Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 189 (CAL)

SUBHASIS DAS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRR/3096/2024 · 2026-02-13

Dinesh Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

13.02.2026 Court No.42 Item No.4 Sudipta CRR 3096 of 2024 Subhasis Das Vs. The State of West Bengal & Anr. Mr. Shamik Chatterjee Mr. Aditya Bikram MAhata Mr. Sahit Kabir …for the petitioner. Mr. Jaydeep Biswas Ms. Suchismita Dutta …for the State. Mr. Uttam Kumar Shaw …for the de facto complainant. 1. During the course of submissions, it has been submitted that the chargesheet has already been filed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly submitted that the matter may be relegated back to the learned Trial Court. However, an appropriate direction may be issued for the expeditious disposal of the discharge application, to be filed by the petitioner, expeditiously, after giving an opportunity to the parties of being heard as the petitioner is not well. 3. Learned counsel for the private opposite party has refuted the averments on merits. However, this Court is not going at all on the merits of the case. 2 4. Since the chargesheet has been filed, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file a discharge application before the learned Trial Court. 5. Learned Trial Court shall decide the same expeditiously, without granting any unnecessary adjournment, in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity to the parties of being heard. 6. Hence, the petition stands disposed of. 7. All pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. 8. All parties shall act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)