Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18897 (CAL)

MIR MOSARAF @ MILAN SEKH v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (NDPS)/162/2026 · 2026-01-29

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

29.01.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.18 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Allowed C.R.M. (NDPS) 162 of 2026 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Rampurhat Police Station Case No. 320 of 2025 dated 20.06.2025 under Sections 20(b)/22/29(i) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. And In Re : Mir Mosaraf @ Milan Sekh ... Petitioner. Mr. Saryati Datta ... For the Petitioner. Ms. Sreyashee Biswas, Mr. Md. Yaser A. Ismail ... For the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent of the charges and has been falsely implicated by the investigating authorities as he was a bystander. Learned advocate appearing for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for bail and submits that subject- matter of recovery in the present case is 27.124 kgs. of ganja. The accusation, so far as the present petitioner is concerned, according to the materials available in the case diary as pointed out by the State, is that the petitioner was to receive the consignment and as such, on the basis of specific information, the petitioner has been arrested. I have taken into account the charge-sheet as also the facts which have been narrated in the charge-sheet. Having considered the period of detention of the present petitioner, I 2 am of the view that further detention of the petitioner in connection with the instant case is unwarranted. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner viz., Mir Mosaraf @ Milan Sekh shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-, with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Judge, Special Court under the NDPS Act, Suri, Birbhum. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date so fixed by the learned Special Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of the district of Birbhum without prior permission of the learned Special Court. Additionally, the petitioner will report to the Officer-in- Charge/Inspector-in-Charge, Rampurhat Police Station and obtain acknowledgement once in every ten days. Each and every month, the acknowledgement should be deposited before the learned Special Court in seisin of the present case. The application for bail, being CRM (NDPS) 162 of 2026, is, thus, disposed of. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)