Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18896 (RAJ)

SHAILENDRA JAIN S/O LATE SHRI M. L. JAIN v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/14824/2025 · 2026-01-21

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2821] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14824/2025 Shailendra Jain S/o Late Shri M. L. Jain, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Flat No. 403, Sumeru Ojas Apartment, Plot No. 21-22-23, Block - A, R. K. Puram, Kota (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Urban Development And Housing, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Deputy Secretary To Government Iii, Department Of Urban Development And Housing, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. The Commissioner, Kota Development Authority, Cad Circle, Rawatbhata Rd, Cad Colony, Dadabari, Kota, Rajasthan - 324009. 4. The Secretary, Kota Development Authority, Cad Circle, Rawatbhata Rd, Cad Colony, Dadabari, Kota, Rajasthan 324009. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Siddarth Bapna with Mr. Akshit Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Abhishek Sharma for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 21/01/2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in terms of the directions spelled out in the order dated 22.08.2025 (Annx.1), the petitioner has filed a representation but the respondents have not adjudicated the same, resulting into [2026:RJ-JP:2821] (2 of 2) [CW-14824/2025] disobedience of the directions spelled out in order dated 22.08.2025. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents have assured that the said representation/ any fresh representation filed by the petitioner, shall be considered by the respondents pronto. Heard. Without going into nitty-gritty of the case, and taking note of the fact that the petitioner shall be superannuated in the month of February, 2026, this Court is passing a present direction with due consensus of the counsel representing both the parties that if the representation is filed by the petitioner within three days, from the date of passing of this order, before the competent authority of Urban Development and Housing, the same be considered within a period of 15 days thereafter by way of a speaking order and in accordance with law. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /195