29.01.2026 Court No.35. M /L.261. Rakib (Rejected) CRM (M) 2130 of 2025 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kandi Police Station case no. 333 of 2025 dated 02.07.2025 under Sections 62/65(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 10 of the POCSO Act, 2012. And In the matter of : Susanta Bayen @ Sushanta Bayen. ……Petitioner. Mr. Navanil De Ms. Monami Mukherjee ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Koushik Kundu Mr. Akash Ganguly ……for the State. Mr. Kingsuk Mondal Mr. Suman Das Mr. Sumitra Das .....for the de-facto complainant. Affidavit-of-service filed by the petitioner be kept with the record. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner was a driver of pool car who ravished the victim, a school going student aged about 6 years. Learned advocate submits that since the examination of victim girl is over, petitioner may be released on bail. Learned advocate for the de-facto complainant opposes the prayer for bail. Learned advocate for the State draws the attention of the Court to the materials appearing in the Case Diary. 2 Having considered the nature and gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in CRM (M) 2130 of 2025 is dismissed. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)