Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18893 (CAL)

KANGSHA PRAMANIK v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/80/2026 · 2026-01-29

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

29.01.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 46. Kausik (Rejected) CRM (M) 80 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Rahara Police Station Case No. 219 of 2025 dated 04.08.2025 under sections 25(1a)/25(1b)(a)/25(1b)/25(ia)/25(1aa)/25(6)/25(7)/25(8)/27/29 /30/35 of the Arms Act. And In the matter of : Kangsha Pramanik ……Petitioner. Mr. Tanmay Chowdhury Mr. Shankar Prasad Dalapati Mr. Tamal Taru Panda ……for the Petitioner. Mrs. Anusuya Sinha Ms. Afreen Begum ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for 174 days and only two country- made pistol were recovered from the possession of the present petitioner. Learned advocate for the State submits that from the Office of the present petitioner one 9mm Pistol, one Shooter Pipe and 8 live ammunities were recovered. It has been submitted that all the accused persons are facing the trial. Consequently, the learned Court is directed to proceed to the stage of consideration of charges at the earliest. 2 Petitioner will approach this Court after the evidence of the seizure list witnesses are over. At this stage, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in CRM (M) 80 of 2026 is rejected. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)