GULAM JILANI ANSARI @ BABLU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./6109/2026 · 2026-07-03
Deepak Roshan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18892 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18892 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:19584
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 6109 of 2026
--------- Gulam Jilani Ansari @ Bablu, aged about 34 years, son of Jahur Ansari resident of village-Kalhepat, P.O. and P.S.-Senha, Dist-Lohardaga
....Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand.
....Opp. Party
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Petitioner
: Mr. Shashwat Kumar Jha, Advocate
Mr. Robin Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party
: Mr. Prabhu Dayal Agrawal, A.P.P.
--------- 02/Dated:-03.07.2026
1.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.
The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 310(2), 311, 317(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 in connection with S.T. Case No.95/2026 corresponding to G.R. Case No.138/2026 arising out of Sisai P.S. Case No. 137/2025.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he has committed no offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and charge-sheet has already been submitted and no witnesses have been examined till date. He further submits that several other co-accused persons have been granted bail/anticipatory bail by this Court in A.B.A. No.1426 of 2026, A.B.A. No.2773 of 2026, A.B.A. No.2775 of 2026, B.A. No. 2113 of 2026 and B.A. No.3020 of 2026 and the petitioner for no offence has been languishing in custody since 24.12.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court.
4.
Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
5.
Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegations made against this petitioner coupled with the fact that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and several co-accused persons have been granted bail/anticipatory bail by this Court and that the petitioner is in custody since 24.12.2025; therefore, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Gumla in connection with S.T. Case No.95/2026 corresponding to G.R. Case No.138/2026 arising out of Sisai P.S. Case No. 137/2025.
6.
It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co- operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) JULY 03, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 06/07/2026