Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1889 (JK)

GHULAM MOHAMMAD MIR v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (REVENUE)

WP(C)/1626/2026 · 2026-07-14

Rahul Bharti

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 133 SUPPLEMENTARY CAUSE LIST-1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) No. 1626/2026 CM No. 4247/2026 Ghulam Mohammad Mir …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Syed Mohtasim, Advocate vice Mr. Owais Ashraf Shah, Advocate Vs. Union Territory of J&K through Commissioner Secretary Revenue and Others. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Illyas Laway, GA CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER 14.07.2026 1. Even before this Court could hear an opening argument from the learned counsel for the petitioner with respect to the subject matter of the writ petition what came to be submitted is that there are certain documents which are not accompanying the writ petition and for that adjournment be granted. 2. If the requisite documents were not available at the disposal of the petitioner now found so essential to be cited at the very first hearing of this writ petition, then petitioner should not have ventured to file the writ petition and then ask for an adjournment for placing on record the documents. 3. The petitioner is coming forward as a case of cart before the horse. 4. Writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh one which is duly accompanied with all the requisite documents which the petitioner intends to place on record. 5. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn along with connected CM with aforesaid liberty. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 14.07.2026 Imtiyaz Imtiyaz Ul Gani I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 21.07.2026 17:17