Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1889 (ALL)

SMT SURSATTI DEVI v. STATE OF UP AND 7 OTHERS

WRIC/17339/2026 · 2026-05-04

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17339 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Shri R. C. Singh, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Rituvendra Singh Nagvanshi, learned counsel for the petitioner states that due to inadvertence, certain dead persons have been impleaded as party, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh petition after impleading correct parties. 2. Shri Devesh Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the respondent has no objection. 3. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 4. Certified copy of the order be returned to learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining copy of the same. 5. It is further provided that in case fresh petition is filed, learned counsel for the petitioner will provide copy of the writ petition to Shri Devesh Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the respondent. May 5, 2026 Ved Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raja Ram Pal, Rituvendra Singh Nagvanshi, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ajeet Kumar Shukla, C.S.C., Devesh Kumar Verma, Sarvesh Kant Shukla, Sheetal Verma (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Smt Sursatti Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad