Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18889 (JHR)

AMIT KUMAR SINGH @ AMIT SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./1819/2026 · 2026-07-03

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:19550] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.1819 of 2026 ------ 1. Amit Kumar Singh @ Amit Singh, aged about 36 years, Son of Ram Narayan Singh 2. Ram Narayan Singh, aged about 64 years, S/O Shri Nath Singh Both Petitioner Nos.1 & 2 Resident of Hankerkharp, Jabra, P.O. Jabra, P.S. Simaria, District Chatra, Jharkhand. 3. Praful Ranjan Singh @ Sonu Singh, aged about 36 years, Son of Upendra Singh 4. Monu Singh, Aged about 30 Years, Son of Upendra Singh Both Petitioner Nos.3 & 4 resident of Gram Sohar Kalan, Panchayat Pagar, P.O. Elda, P.S. Simaria, District Chatra, Jharkhand. … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Rishu Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, Addl. P. P. ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-03-07-2026 Heard the parties. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioners with the prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No.2006 of 2021 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 21.08.2025 passed by this Court. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that Cr.M.P. No.2006 of 2021 stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 21.08.2025 passed by this Court to file the proof of deposit of Rs.2,000/- with the Jharkhand State Legal Services Authority (JHALSA). It is next submitted that due to inadvertence, the said amount could not be deposited within the stipulated time which resulted in dismissal of the said Cr.M.P. No.2006 of 2021 for non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated 21.08.2025 passed by this Court. It is also submitted that the said amount has already been deposited the proof of the same has also been filed. It is next submitted that non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated 21.08.2025 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioners have very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.2006 of 2021 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioners will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No.2006 of 2021 be restored to its original file. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, Cr.M.P. No.2006 of 2021 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No.2006 of 2021 before the concerned Bench after a week. This criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-03.07.2026-Animesh/