Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18889 (AP)

S RAMA SANJAMMA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/7084/2026 · 2026-03-12

D Ramesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010129512026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 7084/2026 Between: 1. S RAMA SANJAMMA, D/O S.MALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38YEARS, OCC FIELD ASSISTANT, NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME, R/O R,KOTHURU VILLAGE, RUDRAVARAM MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT 518 594. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT (RD-II) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,VELGAPUDI,AMARVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT A.P., REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY-522 237. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIJAYAWADA, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH-522 501. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CUM, THE DISTRICT PROGRAMME COORDINATOR, MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME AP, NANDYALA DISTRICT-518 501 4. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, THE DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY AND THE ADDL. DISTRICT PROGRAMME COORDINATOR, MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME AP, NANDYALA-518 501 5. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER CUM ADDITIONAL PROGRAMME COORDINATOR, MNREGS-AP, RUDRAVARAM MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT-518 594. ...RESPONDENT(S): The Court made the following ORDER: 1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the 5th respondent in not complying the order of the 3rd respondent passed in RC No. 139/HRM/MEMO/2023 dated 26.12.2025 to take back the petitioner i.e., Smt. S.Ramasanjamma, Field Assistant of Kondamayapallil Gram panchayat, Rudravaram mandal, Nandyal district as illegal, arbitrary, and consequently direct the 5th respondent to re-instate the petitione- as Field Assistant of Kondamayapallil Gram panchayat, Rudravaram mandal, Nandyal district by setting aside the order of the 4th respondent passed in RC No. 139/HRM/MEMO/2023 dated 23.10.2025 and pass….’ 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the action of the 5th respondent in not complying with the order passed by the 3rd respondent in Rc.No.139/HRM/MEMO/2023, dated 26.12.2025, directing the authorities to take back the petitioner, namely Smt. S. Ramasanjamma, Field Assistant of Kondamayapalli Gram Panchayat, Rudravaram Mandal, Nandyal District, into service, is illegal and arbitrary. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that during the pendency of the writ petition the respondent authorities have passed appropriate orders and the petitioner has been reinstated into service vide proceedings Rc.No.MGNREGS/Joining/2026, dated 13.03.2026. In view of the same, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no further orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition. 5. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE D RAMESH 13.03.2026 klk 50 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO:7084/2026 13.03.2026 klk