Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010129072017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 23737/2017 Between:
1. T. NAGAMMA, W/O. MALLIKARJUNA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, ANGANAWADI HELPER, ANGANAWADI CENTRE - 2, HALVI VILLAGE, KOWTHALAM MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. SECY WOMEN
CHILD DEPT
3 ORS, DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KURNOOL KURNOOL DISTRICT, -
3. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
4. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, ICDS PROJECT, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of nature of WRIT. OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of 3rd respondent in issuing impugned order in Progs.No.668/A/2016, dated 28.09.2016, retiring
2
the petitioner prematurely on 30.06.2016 at the age of 50 years before attaining the superannuation age of 60 years, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Art. 14, 16 & 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently DIRECT the respondents to continue petitioner by setting aside the impugned
order passed Progs.No.668/A/2016, dated 28.09.2016 passed by the 3rd respondent in so far as petitioner is concerned IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 29381 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to DIRECT the respondents to continue petitioner by suspending the impugned
order passed Progs.No.668/A/2016, dated 28.09.2016 passed by the 3rd respondent in so far as petitioner is concerned, pending disposal of above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. BUTTA VIJAYA BHASKER Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV-CHILD WELFARE(AP) The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 23737/2017
ORDER:-
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Butta Vijaya Bhaskar,
learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the sole writ petitioner is no more and that the legal representatives are not personally in contact with him. Hence, he prays that appropriate orders may be passed.
2. Accordingly, recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, and in view of the fact that the sole writ petitioner is no more, the Writ Petition is dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________________
JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 12.02.2026 S D P
4
256 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 23737/2017 12.02.2026
W S D P