Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18886 (JHR)

PRADEEP KUMAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH SECRETARY FOREST DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF JHARKHAND

WPC/4490/2026 · 2026-06-30

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:19065 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(C) No.4490 of 2026 ----- 1. Pradeep Kumar, Aged about 45 years, S/O late Shyamgobind Pathak, Resident of village Lodhea, P.O Bichkila P.S. Pratappur District- Chatra Jharkhand - 825404. 2. Madhu Sudan Pathak, Aged about 58 years, S/O late Kashinath Pathak Resident of village House No. 141 A, Near Joda Mandir, Yaduvansh Nagar Chas Bokaro P.O Yaduvansh P.S. Yaduvansh District Bokaro Jharkhand 827043 3. Ashok Pathak @ Ashok Kumar, Aged about 56 years, Son of late Sachida Nand Pathak Resident of village Lodheya, P.O Bichkila P.S. Pratappur District- Chatra Jharkhand - 825404 4. Ajay Kumar Aged about 47 years Son of late Sachida Nand Pathak, Resident of village Ashok Vihar Extention P.O Argora P.S Argora District Ranchi Jharkhand. 5. Vijay Pathak @ Vijay Kumar Aged about 35 Son of late Sachida Nand Pathak Resident of village Lodheya, P.O Bichkila P.S. Pratappur District- Chatra Jharkhand - 825404 6. Rakesh Kumar Pathak @Rakesh Aged about 46 Son of late Balgovind Pathak Resident of village Opposite House No. 190 В Sidhshwar Nagar Rajapul Mainpura Patana P.O. Rajapul P.S. Rajjapul District Patna Bihar 800001 7. Mithilesh Kumar Aged about 39 Son of late Balgovind Pathak, Resident of village Opposite House No. 190 C Sidhshwar Nagar Rajapul Mainpura Patana P.O. Rajapul P.S. Rajjapul District Patna Bihar 800001 8. Mukesh Kumar Aged about 46 Son of late Balgovind Pathak Resident of village Opposite House No. 190 C Sidhshwar Nagar Rajapul Mainpura Patana P.O. Rajapul P.S. Rajjapul District Patna Bihar 800001 … Petitioner(s). Versus 1. State of Jharkhand, through Secretary Forest Department Government of Jharkhand, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi. 2. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Government of Jharkhand, Van Bhawan, Doranda, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi. 3. The Additional Principal Chief Conservator of Forest cum- Managing Director, Jharkhand State Forest Development Corporation Ltd., Van Bhawan, Doranda, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi. 2026:JHHC:19065 2 4. The Chief Conservator of Forest, Government of Jharkhand, Van Bhawan, Doranda, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi. 5. The Conservator of Forest, Forest Department, Chatra, Р.О., P.S. and District Chatra. 6. The Deputy Conservator of Forest, Forest Department, Chatra, P.O., P.S. and District Chatra. 7. The Divisional Forest Officer, North Forest Division, P.O., P.S. and District Chatra. 8. The Deputy Commissioner, Chatra, P.O., P.S. and District Chatra. 9. Additional Collector, Chatra, P.O., P.S. and District Chatra. 10. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Chatra, P.O., P.S. and District Chatra. 11. The Circle Officer, Pratap-pur, P.O. and P.S. Pratap-pur, District Chatra … Respondent(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Ms. Kismanti Minj, Advocate Mr. Jinid Seteng Horo, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar, GA-III …...... 02 /30.06.2026: Heard the learned counsel representing the petitioners and the learned counsel representing the respondents. 2. It is the grievance of the petitioners that the Forest Department has entered into the land of the petitioners and they are making some constructions. It is the case of the petitioners that the land belongs to them and they have inherited the same from their ancestors. 3. After hearing the parties and going through the petition, I find that the basic grievance of the petitioners is that the Forest Department had dispossessed the petitioners from a part of the land which the petitioners are claiming. The Forest Department is also claiming their right. Thus, the title of the petitioners, if any, is under cloud. 4. Considering the nature of the dispute which can be decided only after taking evidence, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition. 2026:JHHC:19065 3 5. The petitioners thus, needs to file a civil suit for declaration of their right, title and interest and also if so advised may pray for interim injunction by filing an application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of the CPC. 6. If the petitioners files any application the same should be considered on its own merits as early as possible without being prejudiced by this order. 7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 30.06.2026 Tanuj/CP-2 Uploaded on 06.07.2026