Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:21753
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 37 of 2022 1 - Smt Ganeshmati @ Ganeshmoti W/o Anand Ram Bariha Aged About 76 Years R/o Village Kishanpur, Post Kishanpur, Tahsil Pithora, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner versus 1 - Meeta Mukharji W/o Prasanna Mukharji, District Education Officer, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Shri Pardeshi Siddhartha Komal Secretary, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh School Education Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS) For Petitioner : Mr. Sajal Kumar Gupta, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Aniket Verma, Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 08/05/2026
1. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that according to his instructions, an amount of Rs.11,31,330/- has been sanctioned pursuant to claim of the petitioner herein and accordingly the pay bill has been prepared on 07.05.2026. He submits that within 1 or 2 days the aforementioned amount will be transferred in the account of the petitioner. RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2026.05.13 19:09:27 +0530
2
2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that documents in this regard is handed-over to him in the Court itself. He however submits that according to his instruction till date the amount has not been transferred in the account of the petitioner.
3. Perused the document placed before this Court by the respondent which is prepared by Drawing and Disbursing Authority i.e. Block Education Officer, Block Pithora of the Education Department, allowing the amount of Rs.11,31,330/- towards interest pension. Respondent has also placed before this Court a copy of prescribed format in Form C.G.T.C.-24 Attachment Establishment Pay Bill mentioning the amount sanctioned in the name of Late Anand Ram Bariha and mentioning the name of the petitioner as nominee.
4. In the aforementioned facts of the case, I do not find appropriate to keep this contempt petition pending and further considering the submission of counsel for the respondent that the amount which is reflecting in the document will be transferred by Monday.
5. Accordingly, the contempt proceedings initiated against the petitioner is dropped, notice is discharged and the contempt petition is closed reserving liberty with the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings, if any exigency arises in future.
Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Ravi Mandavi