2026:JHHC:19072 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(C) No.4500 of 2026 ----- Asraful Islam, aged about 70 years, Son of Late Alfajuddin Ahmad, Resident of Village-Kalikapur, Ward No. 19, Ρ.Ο. & P.S.-Pakur, Dist.-Pakur. … Petitioner(s). Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2.The Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, office at Project Building, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, Dist.-Ranchi. 3. The Secretary, Jharkhand Academic Council, Ranchi having its office at Gyandeep Campus, Bargawan, P.O. & PS- Namkum, Dist. Ranchi. 4. The Deputy Commissioner, Pakur, P.O. P.S.-Pakur, Dist.- Pakur. & 5. The Sub Divisional Officer, Pakur, P.O. & P.S.-Pakur, Dist.- Pakur. 6. The District Education Officer, Pakur, P.O. & P.S.-Pakur, Dist.-Pakur. 7. The Secretary, MadarsaJabbaria Alia, Kalikapur, P.O. & P.S.-Pakur, Dist.- Pakur. 8. Md. Akhrujjaman, Head Maulvi of Madarsa Jabbaria Alia. 9. Aksarul Islam, 10. Azadul Islam, No. 8 to 10 are son of Late Alfajuddin Ahmad, Resident of Village-Kalikapur, Ward No. 19, P.O. & P.S.-Pakur, Dist.-Pakur … Respondent(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Md. Yasir Arafat, Advocate For the State : Mr. Devesh Krishna, SC Mines-III For the JAC : Ms. Risheeta Singh, Advocate …...... 02 /30.06.2026: Heard the learned counsel representing the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the respondents. 2. The petitioner is challenging Annexure-9 to this writ petition. Annexure-9 is an advertisement issued by Madarsa Jabbaria Alia, Kalikapur, District-Pakur for filling of the post of Alim. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the Ex-Headmaster of the school and the current Committee has issued an advertisement by forging signature of 2026:JHHC:19072 2 this petitioner. Thus, this advertisement needs to be quashed. 4. He further submits that present Committee is trying to appoint their kith and kin, which needs to be stopped, thus, on these grounds, he has prayed to quash the advertisement. 5. Both the grounds which the petitioner has raised cannot be considered in this writ petition at this stage. Admittedly the petitioner is the Ex-Headmaster. There is nothing to suggest in the record that the petitioner is the current member of the Managing Committee. Further from the nature of the grievance raised by the petitioner, I find that there is some personal grudge between the parties which led to filing of this writ petition. The petitioner infact has got no locus standi to challenge the said advertisement. 6. On these grounds, this writ petition is dismissed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 30.06.2026 Tanuj/CP-2 Uploaded on 06.07.2026