Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18879 (RAJ)

VIVEK AGRAWAL S/O LATE SHRI SHRIKRISHAN AGARWAL v. SHRI SITA RAM MEENA (IAS)

CCP/965/2025 · 2026-01-23

Anand Sharma

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3327] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 965/2025 Vivek Agrawal S/o Late Shri Shrikrishan Agarwal, Aged About 61 Years, R/o 4/52, SFS, Agrawal Farm, Mansarover, Jaipur-302020. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Sita Ram Meena (Ias), Director, Secondary Education, Department Of Education, State Of Rajasthan, Bikaner (Rajasthan) -334001. 2. Shri Shakti Singh Rathore(Ias), Administrator /chairman, Rajasthan Board Of Secondary Education, Jaipur Road Ajmer, (Rajasthan)-305001. 3. Shri Rahul Singh (Ias), Chairman, Central Board Of Secondary Education, Shiksha Kendra, 2, Community Centre, Preet Vihar, Delhi-110092. 4. Shri Jaiprakash Chaturvedi, Regional Director, Central Board Of Secondary Education, Ajmer (Rajasthan)- 305001. 5. State Of Rajasthan, Through Director, Secondary Education, Department Of Education, (Rajasthan)- 334001. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Sharma with Mr. Rohit Thakar For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Raghav with Mr. Vishwas Saini HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 23/01/2026 1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of order dated 16.05.2025 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7514/2025, whereby directions were given to decide representation of the petitioner. [2026:RJ-JP:3327] (2 of 2) [CCP-965/2025] 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents- contemnors No. 3 and 4 submits that the representation filed by the petitioner has been decided today only and a copy of order dated 22.01.2026 has been placed before this Court, which is taken on record. A copy thereof has also been given to learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. In the light of above, no case of deliberate and wilful non-compliance is made out and this contempt petition filed by the petitioner is hereby dismissed. 4. Notices stand discharged. 5. However, merely dismissal of this contempt petition would not prejudice the right of the petitioner, in case, he desires to challenge order dated 22.01.2026. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /80