Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18878 (RAJ)

MANOHAR SHARMA S/O SH. RAMDHAN SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/6078/2025 · 2026-01-21

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2747] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7004/2025 Purshottam Kumar Sharma S/o Sh. Ramdhan Sharma, R/o C-31, Prem Colony, Surya Nagar, Taro Ki Koot, Sanganer, Jaipur- 302029. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan Through PP 2. Mukesh Chabarwal S/o Sh. Ramkuvar Singh, R/o C-30, Prem Colony, Surya Nagar, Taro Ki Koot, Sanganer, Jaipur 302029. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6078/2025 Manohar Sharma S/o Sh. Ramdhan Sharma, R/o C-31, Prem Colony, Surya Nagar, Taro Ki Koot, Sanganer, Jaipur 302029. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan Through PP 2. Mukesh Chabarwal, S/o Sh. Ramkuvar Singh, R/o C-30, Prem Colony, Surya Nagar, Taro Ki Koot, Sanganer, Jaipur 302029. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jaswant Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 21/01/2026 1. By way of these criminal misc. petitions under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.270/2025 registered at Police Station Sanganer, District Jaipur City (East) (Rajasthan), for offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that vide order dated 20.11.2025, the matter was referred to mediation centre for [2026:RJ-JP:2747] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7004/2025] exploring the possibilities of amicable settlement. The mediation proceedings resulted in a positive outcome. According to the mediation proceedings report dated 10.12.2025, parties have settled the dispute and have mutually executed a “Compromise Deed”, which is annexed with this petition. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor does not dispute the factum of compromise. 4. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal of this Court; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and have mutually executed a “compromise deed” and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh versus State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. versus Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. reported in AIR 1992 SC 604, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 5. In view of the above, these Criminal Misc. Petitions are allowed and the FIR No.270/2025 registered at Police Station Sanganer, District Jaipur City (East) (Rajasthan), is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 6. Stay applications and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /96-97