- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25888 CRL.P No. 4741 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4741 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. SARA SUOLE PVT. LTD. A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT SURVEY NO.62, SITE NO.13, 6TH CROSS, N S PALYA, BTM LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560 076 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MR. PAVEET AMIN GIRISHBHAI. 2. MR. PAVEET AMIN GIRISHBHAI DIRECTOR SARA SUOLE PVT. LTD. AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS SON OF GIRISHBHAI SURVEY NO.62, SITE NO.13, 6TH CROSS, N S PALYA, BTM LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560 076 3. MR. KAYUM RAZAK DHANANI DIRECTOR SARA SUOLE PVT.LTD AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS SON OF RAZAK DAWOOD DHANANI SURVEY NO. 62, SITE NO.13, Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25888 CRL.P No. 4741 of 2026 6TH CROSS, NS PALYA, BTM LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560 076 4. SMT. BIPASHA PAL DIRECTOR SARA SUOLE PVT.LTD AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS SURVEY NO. 62, SITE NO.13, 6TH CROSS, NS PALYA, BTM LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560 076 5. SHESHU KUMAR AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS SON OF C.H. MURULIKRISHNA SURVEY NO. 62, SITE NO.13, 6TH CROSS, NS PALYA, BTM LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560 076 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KIRAN R., ADVOCATE) AND: R K POLYMER REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SUKHRAJ BHANDARI SON OF DHANAJI AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS 31, IV MODEL HOUSE STREET, BASAVANGUDI, BANGALORE - 560 004 …RESPONDENT - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25888 CRL.P No. 4741 of 2026 THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.P.C. (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN AGAINST THE PETITIONERS IN C.C.NO.19868/2024 AT ANNEXURE-A FILED BY THE RESPONDENT FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 138 OF THE N.I. ACT 1881, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE LD XV ADDL.CJM BENGALURU. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The Counsel for the Petitioners submits as under: 1. The Petitioners herein have filed this Petition seeking to quash the entire proceedings in C.C. No. 19868/2024 filed by the Respondent before the Hon'ble XV Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Bengaluru for the offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. 2. It is submitted that the Respondent has withdrawn the said case before the Trial Court on 26.03.2026. Copy of the Order dated 26.03.2026 by the Hon'ble XV Additional - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25888 CRL.P No. 4741 of 2026 Chief Judicial Magistrate at Bengaluru in C.C.19868/2024 is produced as Document No.1 In view of the same, the above petition has become infructuous and hence this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioners to withdraw the Petition. Accordingly, It is prayed." In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE BH List No.: 2 Sl No.: 24