Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18877 (CHH)

GANESH RAM PATEL v. R.K. PATEL

CONT/210/2025 · 2026-05-11

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:22260 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 210 of 2025 Ganesh Ram Patel S/o Late Niranjan Patel Aged About 65 Years Retired Lecturer (T), R/o Village Janakpur, Post And Tahsil Baramkela, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh Chhattisgarh Petitioner(s) versus 1 - R.K. Patel Joint Director Account, Treasury And Pension Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur Dist. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 2 - Dr. K. Venktrao District Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prabhakar Dashre, Advocate on behalf of Mr. R.S. Patel, Advocate For Resp No.1 : Mr. Sapnomay Chattorpadhyay, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Pawan Shrivastava, Advocate For Resp No. 2 : Mr. Atanu Ghosh, GA Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 12.05.2026 1. Mr. Atanu Ghosh, learned Government Advocate, submits that on the previous date of hearing, a bailable warrant was issued against RAHUL JHA Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2026.05.12 18:27:45 +0530 2 Respondent No. 2. Today, Respondent No. 2 is present before this Court and has filed a reply stating therein that the representation preferred by the petitioner has already been decided on 20/03/2025 and the said decision has also been communicated to the petitioner. A copy of the order passed on the petitioner’s representation has been filed along with the reply. Learned Government Advocate submits that the order passed by this Court has been duly complied with. 2. Let the presence of Dr. K. Venkata Rao, District Education Officer, Raigarh, be marked. 3. Since the representation of the petitioner has already been decided, this Court is satisfied that the order passed by this Court has been complied with in its true spirit. Consequently, nothing further survives for consideration in the present contempt petition. 4. Accordingly, the contempt proceedings are dropped and the petition is disposed of. 5. The Rule is discharged. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE Rahul