2026:JHHC:19433 --1-- A.B.A. No. 3561 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3561 of 2026 ---- Kaushal Kumar @ Kaushal Kumar, aged about 43 years, son of Gangaram Singh, resident of C-2 Shree Bhoomi Assangi, PO and PS – Adityapur, District – Seraikela, Kharsawan .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the State :- Mrs. Shweta Singh, Advocate ---- 02/03.07.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Jhinkpani P.S. Case No.06 of 2026, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2) and 309(4) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that false allegation is made against the petitioner and the petitioner is a proprietor of Aditya Services and the informant has taken vehicle Ashok Leyland after taking loan from Shriram Finance. He further submits that EMIs were not paid and in view of that in terms of the agreement the said vehicle was repossessed on the instruction of the company. He then submits that repossession was done after informing the police in accordance with law and due to that only the petitioner 2026:JHHC:19433 --2-- A.B.A. No. 3561 of 2026 has been falsely implicated in this case. He next submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.18 of the petition. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that allegations are there of snatching Rs.5,500/-. 5. In the FIR the allegation of snatching and assault are not there against the petitioner and it is alleged that those persons were the men of this petitioner. It has been pointed out that the petitioner happened to be proprietor of Aditya Services and for repossession of the vehicle prima facie it appears that this case has been lodged against the petitioner. In the attending facts and circumstances of this case, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa in connection with Jhinkpani P.S. Case No.06 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 03.07.2026 Sangam/