Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18872 (RAJ)

NAMAN LODHA S/O-SH. SUNIL KUMAR LODHA v. RAM BABU SONI S/O-SH. JAGDISH NARAYAN

CW/13698/2025 · 2026-02-02

Bipin Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:4834] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13698/2025 Naman Lodha S/o-Sh. Sunil Kumar Lodha, Aged About 28 Years, R/o-Babu Chand Mal Ji Ka Rasta, Purani Tonk, Tehsil And District- Tonk (Raj.) ---Applicant-Petitioner Versus Ram Babu Soni S/o-Sh. Jagdish Narayan, Prop-Radhey-Radhey Jwellers, Shop No-1,chintamani Complex-Subhash Bazar-Tonk. (Raj.) ---Non-Applicant-Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Atul Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. J.P. Goyal, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Jyoti Swami HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 02/02/2026 1. With the consent of both the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of in the following terms: (i) The arrears of rent from May, 2016 till 28.02.2026, calculated @ ₹2,925/- per month, shall be deposited within a period of four weeks before the learned Rent Tribunal. (ii) The said deposited amount shall be kept in a Fixed Deposit Receipt (FDR) for a period of one year, which shall be renewed from time to time. The amount shall be disbursed only in accordance with the final judgment passed by the learned trial Court in the rent application. [2026:RJ-JP:4834] (2 of 2) [CW-13698/2025] (iii) The respondent–tenant further agrees that he shall deposit @ ₹2,925/- per month from March, 2026 onwards in the bank account of the petitioner. The petitioner agrees that the amount so deposited shall not be utilized and shall be kept intact in the said bank account. The disposal of the deposited amount shall remain subject to the final decision of the rent application. (iv) It is agreed that the monthly rent shall be paid by the respondent–tenant on or before the 15th day of the succeeding month. In case of default in payment of rent for three consecutive months, the respondent–tenant shall be liable to face the consequences as provided under Section 19 A and 20 of the Rent Control Act, 2001. (v) It is also agreed that any amount deposited by the respondent in the bank account of the petitioner shall not affect the rights of either party, and shall not be treated as an admission regarding the existence of the landlord– tenant relationship, which shall be decided by the learned trial Court. 2. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J Sudha/49