Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18872 (CHH)

SANJAY DUBEY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1353/2026 · 2026-05-12

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:22517-DB HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1353 of 2026 Sanjay Dubey S/o. Late Shri Satanand Dubey Aged About 66 Years Retired Assistant Food Officer, R/o. A-1, Kanchanganga Colony, Phase- 1, Harishchand Marg, D.D. Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Arang, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2. ABC D/o. ZYX, Aged About Z Years, R/o. PQR. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Singh, Advocate. For Respondent No.1/State : Mr. S.S. Baghel, G.A. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board 13.05.2026 1. Heard Mr. Pankaj Singh, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the respondent/State. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the 2 following prayers : “ i. Quash and set aside FIR No. 659/2025 dated 11.11.2025 registered at Police Station Arang, District Raipur under Sections 376 and 506, IPC; ii. Quash and set aside Charge Sheet No. 02/2026 dated 05.01.2026 filed by Police Station Arang, District Raipur under Sections 376 and 506, IPC before the learned JMFC, Arang, District Raipur; iii. Quash and set aside the Order dated 08.01.2026 passed by the learned JMFC, Arang, District Raipur taking cognizance of the offences under Sections 376 and 506, IPC in exercise of power under section 210, BNSS which was presented before the learned Court by way of the Charge Sheet No. 02/2026 dated 05.01.2026 by Police Station Arang, District Raipur and proceedings arising thereof and related thereto; iv. Pass such other and further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that charges have already been framed against the petitioner during the pendency of the present petition, therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw the petition. 3 4. In view of the above submission, this CRMP is dismissed as withdrawn, without any further liberty. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet