2026:JHHC:19409 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 3428 of 2024 …… Bablu Nayak, Aged about 33 years, Son of Bhushan Nayak, Resident of Village: Basera Toli, Bundu, P.O.: Bundu, P.S.: Bundu, District: Ranchi, Jharkhand. …. Petitioner(s) -VERSUS- 1.The State of Jharkhand. 2. Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi, P.O.: Ranchi, P.S.: Ranchi, District: Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Additional Collector, Ranchi, P.O.: Ranchi, P.S.: Ranchi, District: Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. District Sub Registrar, Ranchi, P.O.: Ranchi, P.S.: Ranchi, District: Ranchi, Jharkhand. 5. Sub Divisional Officer, Bundu, Ranchi, P.O.: Ranchi, P.S.: Ranchi, District: Ranchi, Jharkhand 6. Executive Magistrate, Bundu, Ranchi, P.O.: Ranchi, P.S.:Ranchi. District: Ranchi, Jharkhand …..Respondent (s) …… CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Subodh Kr. Pandey, Adv For the Respondent (s): Mrs. Sunita Kumari, A.C. to Sr. S.C.-II …… 16/01.07.2026 After some argument learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant writ application may be disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned respondent to re-visit the order, inasmuch as, the petitioner was regularly working in the office of District Sub- Registrar, Bundu and he will try to submit documents showing that he was regularly working since 2011. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the impugned order clearly indicates that there is no document in support of the petitioner to demonstrate that he was 2026:JHHC:19409 2 working since 2011. However, if the petitioner wishes to approach the concerned respondent, he may do so. 3. Having regard to the aforesaid submission the instant writ application stands disposed of with the liberty as prayed for by the petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J) 1.07.2026 Amardeep/ Uploaded on 06.07.2026