Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18869 (PNJ)

KIRANDEEP KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/5998/2026 · 2026-05-20

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-5998-20 IN THE H (147) KIRANDEEP K STATE OF PUN CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Ms. *** MANISHA BAT 1. The the Constitution the official respo petitioners at the representation da 2. It is they are major. T and threats have relatives to kill h petitioner No.2. representation da not been taken in 2026 (O&M) (1) HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AN CHANDIGARH CR Dat EEP KAUR AND ANOTHER Versus F PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANI Mr. R.K. Kachura, Advocate for the Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAG ***  BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed tution of India seeking issuance of a w l respondents No.2 and 3 to protect at the hands of respondents No.4 to tion dated 19.05.2026 (Annexure P-3 It is submitted by the learned coun ajor. They are in love. Their parents ar have even been extended to petitione kill her. She has left her house and No.2. Apprehending danger to their l tion dated 19.05.2026 to the responde ken into consideration and hence, the p AB AND HARYANA AT CRWP-5998-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 20.05.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondents MANISHA BATRA  for the petitioners or DAG, Punjab n filed under Article 226/227 of of a writ of mandamus directing rotect the life and liberty of the to 8 and take action on their 3). d counsel for the petitioners that ents are against their relationship titioner No.1 by her parents and e and has started living with the their lives and liberty, they sent spondent No.2 but the same has the present petition. AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.20 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-5998-20 3. Noti 4. Ms behalf of respon directed to supply 5. I ha learned State co their relationship the veracity of th the sanctity of rel of with a directio Kapurthala to loo 19.05.2026 (Ann necessary step, if found. 6. It is petitioners from them.  20.05.2026 Amit Sharma 2026 (O&M) (2) Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. DAG, espondents No.1 to 3, at this stage. T supply the copy of the petition to her. I have heard learned counsel for ate counsel and without going into t onship as well as without entering up y of the averments made in the petitio y of relationship or age of the petitione irection to the respondent No.2-Senior to look into the matter and dispose o (Annexure P-3) in accordance wi step, if any, genuine threat to life and It is made clear that this order shall from legal action for violation of l (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Ye    DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on tage. The petitioners’ counsel is to her. el for the petitioners as well as into the question of legality of ing upon an exercise to evaluate petition and also with regard to titioners, this petition is disposed Senior Superintendent of Police, pose of the representation dated with law and also to take e and liberty of the petitioners is r shall not be taken to protect the n of law, if any, committed by (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No  AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.20 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.