Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18860 (RAJ)

ARAVALLY PROCESSED AGROTECH PVT LTD v. STATE OF RAJ AND ORS

CW/9485/2017 · 2026-02-04

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:5216] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9485/2017 Aravally Processed Agrotech Pvt. Ltd., Registered Office At Plot No. G-1-102-103, Road No. 13, RIICO Growth Centre, Phase-I, Abu Road, District Sirohi-307026 Through Authorised Representative And Director Rajeev Bhardwaj Son Of Shri Surendra Pal Bhardwaj, Aged About 54 Years ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan Through Director State Food Processing Mission, Directorate Of Industries, Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur. 2. Additional Director Industries, Directorate Of Industries Csr, Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur 3. District Industry Centre, Sirohi Through General Manager. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Mitrucka For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devansh Sharma, DGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 04/02/2026 After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner made a limited prayer that he may be permitted to make a representation to the respondent competent authority as regards the grievances raised in the present writ petition and the respondent authorities may be directed to consider the same and pass appropriate order. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that in case the petitioner submits the representation, the respondent [2026:RJ-JP:5216] (2 of 2) [CW-9485/2017] authorities would consider the same objectively and in accordance with law. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the respondent competent authority as regards his grievances within a period of 15 days from today. In case the respondent authorities receive any representation from the petitioner, they shall consider and pass appropriate, reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of the representation. It goes without saying that in case the respondent authorities find the petitioner eligible for subsidy under the old scheme or the existing scheme, the said benefit may be extended to the petitioner. Pending application/s, if any, also stand/s disposed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /43