Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18850 (DEL)

M/S SATISH BUILDERS v. UNION OF INDIA

O.M.P. (COMM)/372/2020 · 2026-09-21

Om Prakash Shukla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

O.M.P. (COMM) 38/2020 and connected matter $~47 & 48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010517022019 + O.M.P. (COMM) 38/2020, I.A. 972/2020 & I.A. 973/2020 UNION OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, CGSC with Ms. Himanshi Singh, Ms. Monalisa Pradhan and Mr. Suman Ghosh, Advs. versus M/S SATISH BUILDER .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anshul Mittal and Mr. Sparsh Agarwal, Advs. 48 # CNR No. DLHC010521262019 + O.M.P. (COMM) 372/2020 & I.A. 2307/2020 M/S SATISH BUILDERS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anshul Mittal and Mr. Sparsh Agarwal, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, CGSC with Ms. Himanshi Singh, Ms. Monalisa Pradhan and Mr. Suman Ghosh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA ORDER(ORAL) % 21.09.2026 1. Both the parties are ad idem that the matters can be remanded to the learned Arbitrator to adjudicate the proceedings under Section 34(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961 on the ground 1 “Act”, hereinafter Signed By:GUNN Signing Date:21.09.2026 20:35:10 Signature Not Verified O.M.P. (COMM) 38/2020 and connected matter that certain claims have been decided without adequate or no reasoning. 2. In view of the above, the present petitions are disposed of with a direction to the learned Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes, in accordance with Section 34(4) of the Act. 3. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. 4. Let the arbitral record be sent back to the Arbitrator. OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J SEPTEMBER 21, 2026/gunn Signed By:GUNN Signing Date:21.09.2026 20:35:10