1 2026:CGHC:1073 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 1030 of 2025 Richa Paswan D/o Mukesh Paswan Aged About 28 Years Caste - Dusadh (Scheduled Caste) Resident Of Gelhapani North Chirimiri Colliery Police Station And Tehsil Chirimiri, District- Manendragarh- Chirimiri- Bharatpur (C.G.) Present Address- Satipara, Ambikapur, Post Office- Ambikapur District- Surguja (C.G.) ... Applicant versus 1 - Vijay Kumar Sharma S/o Mohanlal Sharma Aged About 30 Years Caste Brahmin Post- Office- Bilaspur Police Station Tehsil And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer Police Station Ambikapur, District- Surguja (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Applicant : None, even in second round. For Respondent No.2/ State : Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board 07/01/2026 1. Perused the impugned order annexed with the present criminal revision. 2. The present criminal revision has been filed against the order dated 20.06.2025, passed by learned Special Judge (Atrocities), Ambikapur, VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2026.01.08 17:38:55 +0530 2 District Surguja, in Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. Unregistered/2025 (Richa Paswan v. Vijay Kumar Sharma), whereby the application filed under Section 175(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been rejected. 3. From perusal of the order impugned, it transpires that the applicant/ complainant filed an application under Section 175(3) of BNSS, 2023 with the allegation that, she made a complaint with respect to alleged incident occurred in the month of November, 2023 at Railway Station, Ambikapur inside the train, but made a complaint on 23.02.2025 i.e. after more than one year. 4. Considering the delayed report made by the complainant and there is no explanation for delayed lodging of the report, the learned Trial Court has rejected the application of the applicant. No other document is annexed in the present criminal revision to substantiate the claim of the complainant and no representation is made on her behalf. 5. I do not find any infirmity or illegality in the order impugned passed by the learned Trial Court. Accordingly, the present criminal revision is dismissed. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved