Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18848 (DEL)

ABBOTT GMBH & ANR. v. DR REDDY S LABORATORIES LIMITED & ANR.

CS(COMM)/988/2026 · 2026-09-15

Jyoti Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CS(COMM) 988/2026 $~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010427792026 + CS(COMM) 988/2026 & I.A. 24810/2026 ABBOTT GMBH & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Anirudh Bakhru, Mr. Naqeeb Nawab, Mr. Vibhav Singh, Mr. Siddhant Sekhri and Mr. Alekshendra Sharma, Advocates. versus DR REDDY S LABORATORIES LIMITED .....Defendant Through: Mr. Ranjan Narula, Mr. Shakti Priyan Nair, Mr. Parth Bajaj and Ms. Gitanjali Vohra, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH O R D E R % 15.09.2026 1. This suit is instituted by the Plaintiffs inter alia seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendant and all others acting on its behalf from using the impugned marks COMIFFIN/COMIFFIN PLUS/ and/or any other mark/device/logo or trade name or trading style that is identical or deceptively similar to Plaintiffs’ registered CREMAFFIN marks, without Plaintiffs’ permission, consent or license, amounting to infringement of trademarks and/or passing off. 2. During the pendency of the suit, parties have amicably settled their inter se disputes. It is agreed that Defendant shall cease use of the impugned marks COMIFFIN/COMIFFIN PLUS/ and/or any other mark/device/logo or trade name or trading style identical or deceptively This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/09/2026 at 10:43:57 CS(COMM) 988/2026 similar to Plaintiffs’ registered CREMAFFIN marks in any manner whatsoever and withdraw the application bearing No. 6716089 in respect of word mark COMIFFIN in Class 05 filed on 19.11.2024 on ‘proposed to be used’ basis and necessary steps will be initiated within three weeks from today. 3. Mr. Narula, on instructions, submits that there is no existing stock of the impugned products with the Defendant albeit small quantity is in circulation in the market, which cannot be recalled. 4. Mr. Anirudh Bakhru, learned counsel for the Plaintiffs, on instructions, gives up other reliefs claimed in the suit in light of the undertaking given by the Defendant. 5. The settlement terms are taken on record. Defendant shall furnish an inventory of the impugned products in the market within three weeks from today and also file an affidavit to this effect in Court within four weeks from today. 6. Suit is decreed in terms of the settlement and paragraph 100 (a) to (d) of the plaint in favour of the Plaintiffs and against the Defendant. 7. Registry is directed to draw up the decree sheet. 8. Suit is disposed of along with the pending application. 9. Plaintiffs are held entitled to refund of entire court fees in accordance with the Court Fees Act, 1870. 10. Date of 05.10.2026 before the learned Joint Registrar stands cancelled. JYOTI SINGH, J SEPTEMBER 15, 2026 S.Sharma This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/09/2026 at 10:43:57