1 of 2 9.AO.593.2022.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.593 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3534 OF 2022 Smt.Balbir Kaur w/o Balbir Singh Sethi Appellant versus Municipal Corpn of Greater Mumbai and another Respondents _______ Mr.Ashok Saraogi with Mr/Amit Dubey for Appellant. Ms.Smita V.Tondwalkar i/by Ms.Komal Punjabi for Respondent-MCGM. _______ CORAM : AARTI SATHE, J. DATE : 13th October 2026 P.C. 1. This Appeal from Order has been filed under Order XLIII, Rule 1(r) read with Rule 104 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (`CPC’) taking exception to the order dated 30th March 2022 passed by the City Civil Court, at Dindoshi (`Trial Court’) in Notice of Motion No.722 of 2022 in L.C.Suit No.481 of 2022 whereby ad-interim relief came to be rejected. 2. Considering that the Appeal from Order challenges the order of rejection of ad-interim relief and as submitted by learned counsel for the Appellant that the Notice of Motion and the Suit are pending adjudication, this Court is of the view that the Notice of Motion along with L.C.Suit be disposed of by the Trial Court as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of nine months from the date of uploading of this order. M.S.Thatte MANISH SURESHRAO THATTE Digitally signed by MANISH SURESHRAO THATTE Date: 2026.10.13 15:27:04 +0530 2 of 2 9.AO.593.2022.DOC 3. It is directed that the parties to the suit shall not take adjournments at the hearing of Notice of Motion and the L.C.Suit. 4. Needless to observe that this Court has not delved into the merits of the matter nor has formed any prima facie view and the Trial Court shall decide the Notice of Motion and Suit independently in accordance with law. All contentions of the parties are expressly kept open. 5. Appeal from Order stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. No costs. Interim Application does not survive and stands disposed of as such. (AARTI SATHE, J.) M.S.Thatte