[2026:RJ-JP:890] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11852/2025 1. Vinita W/o Rajesh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Bad Mohanpura, Near Ganesh Paradise, Iscon Road, Mansarovar Police Station Muhana, Jaipur Raj. 2. Anita W/o Kamlesh @ Kamal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Bad Mohanpura, Near Ganesh Paradise, Iscon Road, Mansarovar Police Station Muhana, Jaipur Raj. 3. Suman W/o Ramesh Chand, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Bad Mohanpura, Near Ganesh Paradise, Iscon Road, Mansarovar Police Station Muhana, Jaipur Raj. 4. Radhey Shyam S/o Dayal, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Bad Mohanpura, Near Ganesh Paradise, Iscon Road, Mansarovar Police Station Muhana, Jaipur Raj. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Vaishanaw For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Addl.G.A. cum P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 09/01/2026 1. At the very out set, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the anticipatory bail application qua the accused-petitioner No.4, Radhey Shyam S/o Dayal. 2. In view of the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the anticipatory bail application qua the accused- petitioner No.4, Radhey Shyam S/o Dayal, is dismissed as [2026:RJ-JP:890] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11852/2025] withdrawn. 3. Petitioners- Vinita, Anita & Suman have filed this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.1514/2023 registered with the Police Station Muhana, District Jaipur City (South) for offence under Sections 143, 332, 353, 427, 504 & 506 of IPC. 4. Heard. 5. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and so also perused the case diary. 6. As regards the bail application of Vinita, Anita & Suman is concerned, in the F.I.R., no specific overt act has been assigned to them. The petitioners Vinita, Anita & Suman are women and they are said to be implicated in this case without there being any specific overt act. 7. Taking into consideration the over all facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that the accused-petitioners Vinita, Anita & Suman are women, this Court deems just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 8. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application qua the accused petitioners Vinita, Anita & Suman is allowed. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Muhana, District Jaipur City (South) in F.I.R. No. 1514/2023 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners Vinita, Anita & Suman, they shall be released on bail, [2026:RJ-JP:890] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11852/2025] provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (I). that the petitioners Vinita, Anita & Suman shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii). that the petitioners Vinita, Anita & Suman shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer, and (iii). that the petitioners Vinita, Anita & Suman shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /254